You can’t spoil a child's vaccination: scientists have dispelled the myth about the dangers of vaccinations for children's immunity
American scientists conducted a large-scale study designed to convince parents who refuse to be vaccinated for children, not to. A group of researchers said that immunization of a child’s vaccinations, which are made from a very early age, do not have a negative impact.
One of the reasons why some mothers and fathers refuse to vaccinate is supposedly the depression of the immunity of children after vaccinations. JAMA magazine publishes the full version of the research results, the general meaning of which boils down to the fact that no suppression is actually not happening.
Researchers carefully checked the medical records of 944 children aged 2 to 4 years. Among them were those who were vaccinated on schedule, and those who, in principle, did not receive a single vaccine.
Scientists did not reveal any difference in the incidence of seasonal illnesses - unvaccinated children suffer no less than their vaccinated peers.
Scientists do not suffer from excessive optimism, and therefore do not believe that their research will radically change the decisions of moms and dads not to vaccinate the child. The absence of epidemics, according to biologists and physicians in the group, creates the illusion that there is no need for vaccinations.
In a number of countries, the issue of child vaccination has to be tough enough. So, in Australia last year, the authorities stopped paying child benefits parents who refuse to vaccinate sons and daughters.
Scientists around the world agree on one thing - the use of vaccines will soon reduce the need for antibiotics, and this in turn will stop the growth of superbugs, which are highly resistant to drugs.
